Wednesday, March 26, 2025

31. How Sweet the Sound

 

31. How Sweet the Sound: A Soundtrack for America. Kwame Alexander. Illustrated by Charly Palmer. 2025. 48 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, nonfiction, picture book for older readers, poetry, history]

First sentence: Listen to the fireside chorus
of the motherland
to the talking drums
dancing beneath the golden sun
that beat a bold tapestry
of yesterday's stories
and tomorrow's dreams.
To the magnetic chants that welcome each day
and the praise songs that sing us farewell.

Premise/plot: Picture book for older readers. How much older? A lot older. The premise is simple enough: an overview or history of Black Music in America. The delivery is anything but simple. How Sweet The Sound requires a LOT of unpacking--which requires effort and diligence. NONFICTION POETRY. History is conveyed through poems. Poetry in and of itself requires a good bit of unpacking to appreciate. The lines are coded; in other words, each poem features many coded lines--insider code that requires unpacking. Meaning can only be clarified/understood if you're in the know. Each poem has a decoder, if you will, annotations that go into greater depth explaining most every word. If you don't read the back matter, then you've missed the point. 

My thoughts: I read it the first time and skipped the back matter. I was not impressed. Not really. Sure I knew that my appreciation was expected, was required, was almost mandatory. (Some books are like that.) I decided that before I gave it a review, I'd reread it. I decided to start with the back matter. Would I recommend this method? Maybe. Probably. It wouldn't hurt. I would either a) suggest starting with the back matter b) suggest reading a spread/poem at a time and then flipping to the back matter.

I don't know that I love this one. I think in part because I keep wanting the book to be something else. Which is not at all fair. I'll try to clarify. I love, love, love, love, love reading picture books about jazz, for example. Fiction. Nonfiction. I have read many picture book biographies of black jazz musicians, for example. I've read picture book biographies of other musicians--not just jazz. This book isn't about one genre, or even a handful of genres. It is all encompassing. ALL genres, many centuries, many decades. There's some name-dropping here and there--mainly coded. But this is like a fly-over or skimming. It isn't a deep-dive. Poetry is a natural choice for the narrative. It is. It truly is. It makes sense in so many ways. Yet poetry is another barrier for me personally.

 

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

30. All Better Now


30. All Better Now. Neal Shusterman. 2025. 528 pages. [Source: Library] [1 star, YA fiction]

First sentence: It was the wrong time to be living on the streets. 

My thoughts (preview): Is this the worst book I've read this year [2025]? YES. So far at least. Why? Horrible premise. Horrible plot. Terrible characters. 

Premise/plot: COVID-19 might be settling down but Crown Royale, a new virus is spreading all around. You either a) catch it and die (4% of cases?) b) catch it and your brain becomes well, Imagine-fied (think of the noxious John Lennon song, "Imagine." This is 96% of cases?) Those who catch it seem to want EVERYONE to catch it.

This story exists in propaganda-land and every character has a hammer or two. Readers never catch a breath from nonsense being shouted, spouted, thrown around, pounded, stamped, etc. 

There are a handful of characters. Not a single character--well, not really--is likeable...or likeable enough. There are two semi-minor characters that aren't dreadful. But essentially it's a duel of propaganda between those wanting to spread Crown Royale (the happy virus that turns your brain to mush) and those wanting create a counter-virus that turns you into a....well....an emotional psycho. One virus strips you of choice and turns earth into "heaven." The other strips you of choice and turns earth into "hell." 

There was not one scene, one character that made this book enjoyable or thought provoking.

My thoughts: I hated this book. I hated it so much. This is sad mainly because I have such WONDERFUL memories of reading and absolutely loving Neal Shusterman's books. Multiple of his I've rated five stars. I've always found them super-compelling, interesting, good, great even. This one was HORRIBLE. Unless you want to feel trapped in a nightmare surrounded by people you detest and can't escape. 


 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

29. The Martian Chronicles

    

29. Martian Chronicles. Ray Bradbury. HarperCollins. 1997 edition. 288 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, science fiction, speculative fiction, classic, short stories]

First sentence: One minute it was Ohio winter, with doors closed, windows locked, the panes blind with frost, icicles fringing every roof, children skiing on slopes, housewives lumbering like great black bears in their furs, along the icy streets.
And then a long wave of warmth crossed the small town. A flooding sea of hart air; it seemed as if someone had left a bakery door open. The heat pulsed among the cottages and bushes and children. The icicles dropped, shattering, to melt. The doors flew open. The windows flew up. The children worked off their wool clothes. The housewives shed their bear disguises. The snow dissolved and showed last summer's ancient green lawns.
Rocket summer. The words passed among the people in the open, airing houses. Rocket summer. The warm desert air changing the frost patterns on the windows, erasing the art work. The skis and sleds suddenly useless. The snow, falling from the cold sky upon the town, turned to a hot rain before it touched the ground. Rocket summer. People leaned from their dripping porches and watched the reddening sky.  

Premise/plot: Martian Chronicles is a collection of Mars-themed short stories. It has been published in several different editions. New stories kept getting added, for example, small edits here and there. The earliest stories are from the 1940s. Each chapter can (and does) stand alone. The stories do have a flow, and, perhaps some do depend on what has gone before. But there is not one main character. It doesn't follow a particular person or family. 

This time around [I might have rearead this one a half dozen times or so] I read it from the Library of America edition (2021). It uses the *original* dates. And it includes all of the stories, I believe. 

January 1999 Rocket Summer
February 1999 Ylla
August 1999 The Summer Night
August 1999 The Earth Men
March 2000 The Taxpayer
April 2000 The Third Expedition
June 2001 And the Moon Be Still As Bright
August 2001 The Settlers
December 2001 The Green Morning
February 2002 The Locusts
August 2002 Night Meeting
October 2002 The Shore
November 2002 The Fire Balloons
February 2003 Interim
April 2003 The Musicians
May 2003 The Wilderness
June 2003 Way in the Middle of the Air
2004-2005 The Naming of Names
April 2005 Usher II
August 2005 The Old Ones
September 2005 The Martian
November 2005 The Luggage Store
November 2005 The Off Season
November 2005 The Watchers
December 2005 The Silent Towns
April 2026 The Long Years
August 2026 There Will Come Soft Rains
October 2026 The Million Year Picnic

My thoughts on individual stories, and, first sentences from the stories

"Ylla"

They had a house of crystal pillars on the planet Mars by the edge of an empty sea, and every morning you could see Mrs. K eating the golden fruits that grew from the crystal walls, or cleaning the house with handfuls of magnetic dust which, taking all dirt with it, blew away on the hot wind.
A story told solely from the perspective of the Martians, in this case, a husband and wife. A husband has a very definite reaction to his wife's strange dreams. She dreams of a man, Nathaniel York, coming in a ship, in a rocket, and landing. The dream even tells her where and when. But her controlling and perhaps jealous husband has a way of dealing--for once and for all--with his wife's dreams.

"The Earth Men"
Whoever was knocking at the door didn't want to stop. Mrs. Ttt threw the door open. "Well?"
The story of the second expedition. Let's just say that the welcoming committee wasn't quite what they expected! First, NO ONE wanted to bother with them, then they were greeted by a strange assortment of Martians all claiming to be from Earth. And then....well, that wouldn't be polite of me to spoil it!
"The Third Expedition" (aka Mars is Heaven)
The ship came down from space. It came from the stars and the black velocities, and the shining movements, and the silent gulfs of space. It was a new ship; it had fire in its body and men in its metal cells, and it moved with a clean silence, fiery and warm. In it were seventeen men, including a captain. 
This one is a classic short story that you may have stumbled across in another context from The Martian Chronicles. (I've heard two radio adaptations, for example.) And the title is self-explanatory. It is the story of what happens when the third expedition lands. It is the story of what they see and  WHO they see. It is a story that stretches you, perhaps. But it's a good one!

"--And the Moon Be Still As Bright"
It was so cold when they first came from the rocket into the night that Spender began to gather the dry Martian wood and build a small fire. He didn't say anything about a celebration; he merely gathered the wood, set fire to it, and watched it burn.
And now we're on to the fourth expedition, the fourth rocket ship to successfully land on Mars. This time they manage to stay alive past the initial day or two or three. This is the story of what happens when one of the crew members, Spender, goes off on his own to learn the Martian culture, to explore the ruins, to explore the cities, to examine the artifacts and remnants of a culture that is gone with the wind. What happens next...well....there are a million reasons why readers shouldn't sympathize with Spender, but, like Captain Wilder, they may feel the pull all the same.


"The Settlers"
The men of Earth came to Mars. They came because they were afraid or unafraid, because they were happy or unhappy, because they felt like Pilgrims or did not feel like Pilgrims. There was a reason for each man. They were leaving bad wives or bad jobs or bad towns; they were coming to find something or leave something or get something, to dig up something or bury something or leave something alone. They were coming with small dreams or large dreams or none at all.
One of my favorite vignettes. For some reason it reminds me of John Steinbeck.

"Night Meeting"
Before going on up into the blue hills, Tomas Gomez stopped for gasoline at the lonely station.
There is something haunting and fantastical about this short story of a human and Martian meeting and not exactly seeing the same reality.

"The Fire Balloons"
Fire exploded over summer night lawns. 

 I first read "The Fire Balloons" in another collection of Ray Bradbury stories. I didn't, at the time, see it as being part of The Martian Chronicles. (And, in fact, it wasn't part of the edition I first read.) But now it is one of my favorite stories! In it two priests go to Mars as missionaries. One at least was expecting, was hoping, to meet Martians, to actually BE a missionary TO Martians, to an alien species. So when given the opportunity of going out into the hills and trying to communicate with blue balloon-like hovering creatures OR ministering to humans who have migrated to Mars, the answer is clear to Father Peregrine. But do the Martians need his church? This story has one of my favorite quotes:
"Father Peregrine, won't you ever be serious?"
"Not until the good Lord is. Oh, don't look so terribly shocked, please. The Lord is not serious. In fact, it is a little hard to know just what else He is except loving. And love has to do with humor, doesn't it? For you cannot love someone unless you put up with him, can you? And you cannot put up with someone constantly unless you can laugh at him. Isn't that true? And certainly we are ridiculous little animals wallowing in the fudge bowl, and God must love us all the more because we appeal to His humor."
 "The Wilderness"
Oh, the Good Time has come at last--
It was twilight and Janice and Leonora packed steadily in their summer house, singing songs, eating little, and holding to each other when necessary. But they never glanced at the window where the night gathered deep and the stars came out bright and cold.

This is another story that I ended up loving. And it was new-to-me too, it not being part of the original. But in this story we meet two women who are about to travel to Mars to get married and settle down. (The men having gone first.) The story likens exploring and settling Mars to exploring and settling the Old West (places like Wyoming, California, Oregon, etc.) It is about how the two handle their last night on Earth.
Is this how it was over a century ago, she wondered, when the women, the night before, lay ready for sleep, or not ready, in the small towns of the East, and heard the sound of horses in the night and the creak of the Conestoga wagons ready to go, and the brooding of oxen under the trees, and the cry of children already lonely before their time?...Is this then how it was so long ago? On the rim of the precipice, on the edge of the cliff of stars. In their time the smell of buffalo, and in our time the smell of the Rocket. Is then then how it was? And she decided, as sleep assumed the dreaming for her, that yes, yes indeed, very much so, irrevocably, this was as it had always been and would forever continue to be. 

"Way In the Middle of the Air" 

"Did you hear about it?"
"About what?"
For better or worse this story exists. It does. I can see why some editions sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist. Is that the right call? Maybe. Maybe not. It concerns a racist family airing very vocally their views about 'a certain race' [the n-word is used throughout] joining the space race and going to Mars. It is a violent story. It is an ugly story. I didn't feel it enhanced the collection as a whole. However, it is what it is. And when the story was written racism WAS in play. It would have been written before the Civil Rights movement and perhaps gives one vignette of the times.

"Usher II" (aka Carnival of Madness)

"During the whole of a dull, dark and soundless day in the autumn of the year, when the clouds hung oppressively low in the heavens, I had been passing alone on horseback, through a singularly dreary tract of country, and at length found myself, as the shades of evening drew on, within view of the melancholy House of Usher..." Mr. William Stendahl paused in his quotation. There, upon a low black hill, stood the house, its cornerstone bearing the inscription: 2036 A.D.

I remembered this as being one of the stories in A PLEASURE TO BURN, a Ray Bradbury collection celebrating the creative stories leading up to the writing/publishing of Fahrenheit 451. And it was first published as "Carnival of Madness." But it was also part of Ray Bradbury's book, The Martian Chronicles. And it is perhaps one of the most memorable of the collection. It is a true must read for anyone who loves Fahrenheit 451, for it continues on some of the same themes. I don't want to say too much about it really, because it shouldn't be spoiled at all if you want to get the full enjoyment of it!

"The Martian"
The blue mountains lifted into the rain and the rain fell down into the long canals and old LaFarge and his wife came out of their house to watch. 
An elderly couple have come to Mars and one night they are surprised by the appearance of their "son" (who died and was buried back on Earth). Their "son" doesn't want to leave the house, and is enjoying his family too much to risk getting "trapped" by going into the city and interacting with others. This story is creepy.


"The Luggage Store," "The Off Season," "The Watchers," "The Silent Towns," "The Long Years," "There Will Come Soft Rains," and "The Million Year Picnic."

These stories, I feel, work best as a sequence showing what happens both on Earth and Mars when the worst happens--atomic war on Earth. In "The Luggage Store," one speculates that his business will improve greatly if the war happens, if the worst happens. He feels that everyone will want to go back home to Earth to be with their loved ones, to find out if their loved ones are okay, to try to piece their society and civilization back together. In "The Off Season" readers learn that the war has started and the destruction has begun. There is nothing truly comical about it, but, it does happen to be told from the point of view of a man who has just opened a hot dog stand. "The Watchers" shows the people leaving Mars to return to Earth--for better or worse. "The Silent Towns" and "The Long Years" are two stories set on Mars. The first, "The Silent Towns" is told from the point of view of a man who chose to stay behind. He's lonely, but not THAT lonely it turns out. He does meet one woman who stayed behind, but, he decides that his own company is enough after all. "The Long Years" sees the return of Captain Wilder, I believe, who discovers a man and his family. There is a twist, however, which prevents this one from being a happy story. "There Will Come Soft Rains" is a very, very, very lonely story where we get a glimpse--just a small glimpse perhaps--of the desolation and destruction of life as we know it in at least one human city. We see the ending of an era, perhaps. There are no human characters in this one. "The Million Year Picnic" resonates even more when seen back-to-back with "There Will Come Soft Rains." In this story, readers meet a family: parents and sons who have come to Mars on their own private Rocket--a rocket that has been hidden away for many years, a rocket that has been saved for a true emergency. We meet a father who has prepared for THE END in a big, big way.

 

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Saturday, March 22, 2025

Week in Review #12

 This week I read nine books! 

26. To Say Nothing of the Dog. (Oxford Time Travel #2) Connie Willis. 1998. 512 pages. [Source: Bought]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy TIME TRAVEL
  • You enjoy VICTORIAN ENGLAND
  • You enjoy mysteries/detective fiction especially that of Dorothy Sayers
  • You enjoy romance with banter

27. One Wrong Step. Jennifer A. Nielsen. 2025. 336 pages. [Source: Library] [5 stars, mg historical, mg action, mg survival, mg fiction]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy coming of age stories AND survival/peril stories
  • You enjoy historical fiction set in the 1930s
  • You enjoy adventure/survival stories, especially mountain climbing stories

28. Famous Last Words. Gillian McAllister. 2025. 336 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars] 

Read this if...

  • You don't require thrills in your thriller
  • You like predictable twists and turns
  • You enjoy dull characters

 26. I Have Three Cats. Michelle Sumovich. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [picture book, cats, pets, 3 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy cats
  • You enjoy slow-thaw stories (the main character is grumpy towards the cat at first)


27. How To Make a Bedtime. Meg McKinlay. Illustrated by Karen Blair. 2025. 32 pages. [Source: Library] [4 stars, picture book, bedtime books]

Read this if...
You enjoy bedtime stories
You don't mind mixed families--BEARS AND HUMANS


28. The Baby Who Stayed Away Forever. Sandra Salsbury. 2025. 40 pages. [Source: Library] [picture book, bedtime book, humor, family, 5 stars]

Read this if...

  • You enjoy humorous stories about situations that are far from funny *if* you are still in the midst of them
  • You enjoy BABIES with lots of personality and spunk



25. Sing!: How Worship Transforms Your Life, Family, and Church. Keith and Kristyn Getty. 2017. B&H Books. 176 pages. [Source: Review copy]

Read this if...

  • You love hymns and worship songs
  • You don't love hymns and worship songs
  • You want ideas on how to incorporate singing into your home life


26. 8 Bible Stories for Early Readers (Adventure Bible) Illustrations by David Miles. 2025. Zondervan. 248 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars]

Read this if...

  • You don't mind MOSES' story being presented before Joseph's story
  • You are looking for an early reader Bible story book
  • You don't mind super-super-super stripped down and simplified Bible stories


2. The Holy Bible, 1611 Edition, King James Version, 400th Anniversary, Hendrickson Publishers. 1611/2003. God. 1536 pages. [Source: Bought] [5 stars]


Read this if...

  • You find the original spelling from 1611 charming, delightful, enjoyable to decode
  • You enjoy collecting early Bible translations

Century of Viewing Week 12

1910s

  • 1916 Intolerance I am SO conflicted. On the one hand, there are several versions of this one to pick from. The one I watched was two hours and forty-seven minutes. So perhaps there were scenes missing that would have influenced my overall impressions? On the other hand, I can only speak to the scenes I did see. There are FOUR stories. The screen-time of each varied greatly. The significance of each time varied greatly. One of the four is during the life of Christ. Viewers see several scenes from his life--including the wedding at Cana, the adulterous woman (John 8), the Crucifixion, and perhaps one more? two more? These scenes might be weighted in significance. Perhaps. Perhaps not. But they make up a tiny-tiny-tiny fraction of screen time. The medieval France story also gets very little overall screen time. The 'big picture' of that story is Catholics vs. Huguenots. I am NOT to judge the movie that could have been or should have been. But part of me can't help *wanting* that one to be more fully fleshed. The Ancient Babylon story gets a LOT of screen time. They also got elaborate sets and costumes. And, I'll be fair when I can, the actress playing MOUNTAIN GIRL was great--absolutely fantastic in the role. If there's a single stand-out performance in the whole movie, it goes to HER. No doubt in my mind. This story line features a lot idolatry, idol worship, sacrifices to idols, pleasure-oriented 'exotic' lavishness. I could have sworn I saw some nudity. HOWEVER I have not been able to verify that. So perhaps the clothes were just on the side of sheer and immodest. The modern story also gets a LOT of screen time. For better or worse. Without the modern story, I'm not sure there is a film to be seen. For better or worse, however while the story is certainly something worth telling, I found the acting to be terrible. Dear One and The Boy are tolerable--but just just. There is nothing compelling about their performances. Just distracting over-the-top. You don't have to be *so, so, so, so, so, so* over the top to convey EMOTIONS and tell a story. Sometimes less is more. Sometimes a lot LESS is fantastic. The theme is conflicting as well. Because there's a thin line at times. Because it is 'good' to be intolerant of evil, of injustice, of wrongs. To tolerate immorality is intolerant. That being said, the story they "chose" to represent the modern times, of course, set the Reformers up to be evil (boo, hiss) and the good characters to be unjustly treated by the Reformers. And that's the story that plays out. I don't necessarily believe in legislating morality (this film was BEFORE Prohibition), but I don't believe in legislating immorality either.

1920s

  • 1922 The Blacksmith What a difference watching a different, longer version makes! Apparently, the "Blacksmith" that is most commonly seen as being "The Blacksmith" was a pre-release copy and not its final edited form. (You work with what you got. And I'm just super thankful for what silent films *do* exist and have been saved. Especially Buster Keaton films. But this version was a more recently discovered, recovered "final" version found in Europe. So there are quite a few changes to the film. I like both versions. I do. But I *love* some of the scenes in this one. It works for me better. 
  • 1926 The General. This time I compelled my mom to watch with me. (Dad I compelled a few weeks ago). I won't stop until the whole world joins in. Joking. Not joking. I love this movie so much. Johnny Gray, train engineer, risks all to save his two loves--his engine (The General) and his girl (Annabelle).

1930s

  • 1935 Palooka from Paducah is a Buster Keaton short film for Educational Pictures. Whatever you do, don't let this be your first Buster Keaton. Was it the worst thing I've ever watched? No. Was it entertaining? Not really. Could it have been better? Definitely. Could it have been worse? For sure. Let's start with the positive: Buster Keaton stars with almost his entire family--father, mother, and sister. (Remember this was in the midst of the Great Depression. Buster Keaton had fallen from his 'movie star' salary. (His wife literally took everything--everything, everything--in the divorce.) There was never not a time in his life--from age four on up--where he wasn't supporting the family. Joe Keaton has starred with his son in plenty of silent movies. No matter how horrible times were, Buster Keaton found a way. This script certainly was 'a way.' There were a few funny bits: namely the family playing horse shoes, passing food around the table, Buster getting clunked on the head by his brother's boots, all the snoring, dog howling. Tame stuff to be sure. Not outstanding humor. Moving onto the less positive: it was sports themed. And not in a good way like Battling Butler. This one had Buster getting knocked around (as a referee to a wrestling match) but no big victory for Buster. It was his "brother" in the wrestling ring who triumphed. The film-making could have been better. Most of the time dear Buster's face was completely blocked by the ropes of the ring. So there weren't even any possibilities for screen shots. Battling Butlers was all kinds of awesome. There was all this build-up and a fantastic boxing match. This was just....so far from entertaining.One *small* thing that could have improved this movie a tiny bit was to not have all the men wear those horrid fake beards to mark them as 'hillbillies.'

1950s

  • 1953 Calamity Jane is a musical set in the Black Hills of Dakota. I adored this film as a young child. (Doris Day, Howard Keel). I still adore this film. I love the songs--most of them anyway. I love everything about this one.
  • 1956 Trapeze. Do I like circus movies? Not particularly. This one stars Tony Curtis and Burt Lancaster. I liked those two just fine. However, I didn't really care for the female character. The character is why the book of Proverbs exists. Seriously. Run far, run fast, avoid at all costs. I hated this character so much. And I can't say that the ending saved it. Yet what I enjoyed I did enjoy.

1960s

  • 1962 Billy Rose's Jumbo Again do I like circus movies? NO. Not really. It was just chance that had me viewing two in one week--mere days apart. This one stars Doris Day and Stephen Boyd. And JUMBO of course (the elephant). A little amount of Jimmy Durante goes a *long, long, long, long* way. I enjoyed some of the songs of this musical. However, the film's main problem is that it is about ten to fifteen minutes too long. The last ten minutes or so of film are pure torture.

1970s

  • 1972 Man of La Mancha is a musical. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE two of the songs. "Impossible Dream" and "Dulcinea" are among my favorites. Truly. Especially "Impossible Dream." The musical itself is rough around the edges. There's some BRUTALITY that is just tough to get through. Just raw, rough stuff. The musical is in a framework. I liked it overall, but some songs I loved.

1980s

  • 1980 Coal Miner's Daughter. It has been a while since I saw this bio-drama of Loretta Lynn. I *probably* saw a somewhat edited for TV version growing up. Though I can't say for certain that it was. There are some brutal things about this one--though realistic, I suppose, if you are going to be true to life and not sugar-coat everything. 
  • 1985 Ladyhawke is something. I have categories by which I'm sorting/classifying movies. It doesn't quite fit in period drama, romantic drama, or speculative fiction. Or it fits slightly in all three. Regardless, MAGIC CURSES with fantastical elements in otherwise a romantic period drama. He is cursed to be a wolf (at night). She is cursed to be a hawk (by day). Their love is everlasting...but can the curse be broken. Enter baby Matthew Broderick. Not really. It's just I don't think I've seen him younger than this. (But what do I know???) I enjoyed this one. The soundtrack is "special" to say the least. Though it did tame way down by the end. It almost sounded like the composer was watching the actual movie instead of an aerobics class.

2000s

  • 2008 Iron Man. LOVE the ending. LOVE the character--though it takes many films for him to become the man I love. I did notice--though this isn't surprising--is that silent movies *are* good for me. In that, silent movies *make* me pay attention to the screen. I can't rely 100% on my ears, on listening, on following the story based on one sense alone. I fall into a lazy pattern of  doing mostly listening. Silent movies engage me in a way that require more work and are thus more rewarding. That being said, could I try to be more vigilant about talkies. YES. But I am all about the characters and very little concerned with all the action-y fighty bits. I don't see that changing.

2020s

  • 2025 The Electric State. I don't know how many 2025 movies I'll get to. This one was okay. I've heard reviews that talk about it as being the worst movie ever. I wouldn't go that far. I've not heard anyone praise it as being awesome and fantastic. I don't think I will. It was okay for what it was. I liked the premise of the alternate reality 90s after a robot uprising. I thought it had potential. Not sure it lived up to the potential. But it wasn't painful.


© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

28. Famous Last Words

 

28. Famous Last Words. Gillian McAllister. 2025. 336 pages. [Source: Library] [3 stars]

First sentence: It is one hour before Camilla's life changes, though she doesn't yet know it.

Premise/plot: Readers are promised (but does it deliver?!?!) a twisty-turny crime novel. Camilla, our heroine, is returning to work from maternity leave on the day her husband, Luke, commits a crime. Allegedly commits a crime. He never stands trial. He goes on the run. Her life changes forever--as does her daughter's Polly. Most of the novel takes place seven years later. (And to a smaller extent, an additional seven years after that]. This one is told through two perspectives that of Camilla and that of Niall, the hostage negotiator assigned to the case. Though the narration is not even: readers will go [long] stretches without Niall's narration.

My thoughts: It had one job. One job. ONE. To be twisty-turny. To keep *this* reader guessing, guessing again, guessing yet again. To keep me doubting my instincts and delivering punchy surprises. Things that would only supposedly make sense at the end. Did it deliver????

NO. That's the short answer. No, it did not keep me guessing because I guessed correctly essentially about anything where clues were provided. No big thrills. No big surprises. It has me doubting a review by a famous author that uses words like "brilliant" and "blindsided." (How many books has she read?) 

I don't consider myself particularly outstanding when it comes to "solving" crime books or thrillers. So did I just happen to be lucky in my guess? Or is it poorly constructed to make readers feel smart when they guess? 

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

A
H
E
A
D

Be

W
A
R
N
E
D

So the jacket flap intentionally spoils a lot of the early suspense. That's a choice. For better or worse. It's a way to get a reader, perhaps, to pick up your book. Though with her NAME and reputation, I don't know that it's necessary to spoil that much.

So the big question throughout is *WHY* and to a much lesser degree *how*.

I guessed VERY early on that Charlie was NO GOOD, VERY BAD. I don't know how she could have made it more obvious. So that zaps a lot of suspense out of the book.

I guessed VERY early on that Luke was the true author of her "new book by Adam" that she received in the mail. Was this a lucky guess? Maybe. Maybe not. But the way we were getting excerpts and the fact that it was crime related....it just made the most sense to me.

I did not guess about Luke witnessing the murder of two teens in April---however, that clue was sprinkled so late in the book that it almost doesn't contribute to the suspense in the first place. The only clue for the longest time being that his location was turned off that one night in April. Not any clue with which to build a back story.

I did guess that Isabella was HIDING something big. I was a little suspicious of her husband as well. Though her husband takes up so little space in the story it was easy to forget he existed at all. 

So did I guess that Luke's actions could 1000% be explained away. Yes. Mostly. I guessed that as the most obvious "blindsiding" twist and turn.

I think the book would have been more suspenseful without Charlie's "short" and not-so-subtle perspective.

© 2025 Becky Laney of Becky's Book Reviews